Conficker Worm Saves Hundreds from Traffic Violations
Since it was first introduced several months ago, the dreaded Conficker worm has been synonymous with wreaking havoc on computers worldwide. Almost no one would ever consider its creation a "good" thing, but that may be changing, if only in one isolated incident.
Ironically the virus, warned to be harmful to millions of people around the globe, has actually made a few hundred fans in England. The warm reception came following a planned attack on Manchester City Council (MCC).
According to the Manchester Evening News, a total of 1,609 traffic tickets could not be issued within the 28-day legal limit, rendering them void and altogether useless. Worst of all, the attacks ended up costing the MCC more than 43,000 GBP (Great Britain Pound) in lost bus lane fines. (Source: itpro.co.uk)
Financial Losses Don't End There
A series of new reports filed by the Manchester City Council reveal that the Conficker virus ended up totaling 1.5 million GBP in lost earnings. This included a hefty 1.2 million GBP via the IT department bill, 600,000 GBP for consultancy support and expertise and another 600,000 GBP to bring forward the purchase of Wyse Terminals as replacements for the compromised PCs.
There was also 178,000 GBP in staffing costs, with most spent in covering the processing backlog for benefits.
Why did Conficker Target the Manchester City Council?
While the Conficker virus has zeroed in on a number of IT businesses this year, many still question why the Manchester City Council was chosen to be the target this time.
In the aftermath of the attacks, the answer is now known: MCC had no IT disaster recovery plan established in case of emergency.
The shortcomings have since been addressed to prevent future attacks. Steve Park, head of IT at the Manchester City Council, attempted to reassure the public after claiming that the MCC has now "built on and improved a disaster recovery strategy, which covers all main networks." (Source: itpro.co.uk)
However, more than a few people are claiming that any strides made now are "too little, too late" in terms of preparing for a future Conficker attack. While online deviants would not likely reappear for a second time, many feel that the damage to the MCC has already been done during the first wave of attacks.
Most popular articles
- Which Processor is Better: Intel or AMD? - Explained
- How to Prevent Ransomware in 2018 - 10 Steps
- 5 Best Anti Ransomware Software Free
- How to Fix: Computer / Network Infected with Ransomware (10 Steps)
- How to Fix: Your Computer is Infected, Call This Number (Scam)
- Scammed by Informatico Experts? Here's What to Do
- Scammed by Smart PC Experts? Here's What to Do
- Scammed by Right PC Experts? Here's What to Do
- Scammed by PC / Web Network Experts? Here's What to Do
- How to Fix: Windows Update Won't Update
- Explained: Do I need a VPN? Are VPNs Safe for Online Banking?
- Explained: VPN vs Proxy; What's the Difference?
- Explained: Difference Between VPN Server and VPN (Service)
- Forgot Password? How to: Reset Any Password: Windows Vista, 7, 8, 10
- How to: Use a Firewall to Block Full Screen Ads on Android
- Explained: Absolute Best way to Limit Data on Android
- Explained: Difference Between Dark Web, Deep Net, Darknet and More
- Explained: If I Reset Windows 10 will it Remove Malware?
My name is Dennis Faas and I am a senior systems administrator and IT technical analyst specializing in cyber crimes (sextortion / blackmail / tech support scams) with over 30 years experience; I also run this website! If you need technical assistance , I can help. Click here to email me now; optionally, you can review my resume here. You can also read how I can fix your computer over the Internet (also includes user reviews).
We are BBB Accredited
We are BBB accredited (A+ rating), celebrating 21 years of excellence! Click to view our rating on the BBB.